No impression at all, I might need to try it more.įor me Krita is nice to draw and paint (although I would prefer to make the base layers on Medibang first then slowly render on Krita). I have it come with my Wacom Intuos Comic, not use it much.
#Gimp vs krita reddit trial#
You may try CSP (there has a trial version, unlimited time but minus save, load and color pick and some other functions). It is a double edge function, sometime you want to keep in a certain size but it keep reset every single damn time, but it is also convenient if you like the default size.
Brush will reset the size after you choose the other brush. The learning curve is quite stiff and depend on custom so much compare to SAI ad Medibang/FireAlpaca. Basically a CPU with 2GHz clock and upper and you will be fine. Performance issue, especially in AMD CPU and GPU in rendering stuff, but it is getting better. I would love Paintstorm Studio's UI although that program is hella buggy. Life saver for Linux user, but it also give some trouble with it. I mean quite proper timeline and stuff, not half ass like FireAlpaca. And it is even pretty close with some PS brushes.
#Gimp vs krita reddit portable#
Portable version for screw up and test and keep in in your flash drive if you don't want to bring your laptop with you. Light in size and pretty ok in performance (RAM and CPU usage). I tried lots of programs and here is some Krita stuff I've tested. Besides that, krita has the "quick settings" docker which is like Sai brush sizes or medibang's.īut this is all from my experience, the best way to know if its good for you is testing, I for sure forgot lots of features and problems but those were the ones i could remember. Or if you use the switch to previous preset hotkey, the size is kept. Its true brushes reset if you change brushes(which personally I don't see as a problem), but there are 2 ways for this to not happen, you can in the brush preset check "temporarily save tweeks for preset" which will keep the size.Interface is a matter of preference, I think krita has a good interface but thats my opinion.I dont see any problem with the clipping mask, its just different where you need to make a group layer for it to work but other that I don't see any differences from medibang.And since its always good to have more than one point of view in matters like this: Krita is not perfect but some of the problems /u/Aayry pointed out I just can't agree. (to be honest sometimes i just prefer to do the painting in medibang to avoid this) Smudge brush engine is difficult to control, so using blending and wet brushes can be difficult at the beginning.Not the best for pixelart (lines can be jaggy very easily).has a learning curve with creating brush presets.Text tools (better than before, still not optimal).Requires a lot of memory, don't get surprised with lag with huge brushes or canvas also documents taking up 1gb of ram (merge your layers can save you).Canvas only mode where you can hide toolbars and dockers to have a bigger area.Wrap around mode (if you are into making seamless textures).you can also copy from inkscape and paste on krita) vector tools (although not perfect can be helpful.highly customizable ( you can change most of the shortcuts).shift+drag to quickly increase and decrease the brush size.Assistant tools (a bit buggy but gosh vanishing point assistant tool can be a life saver).Powerful preset editing (but also complicated at first).Layer styles (basically photoshop layer effects).Powerful program (has lots of features and also the gmic filters).Please note all this time I said brush tips, to use them you will need to create new presets(in krita you create a new one by changing an existing preset and saving it with another name). from what i tested it also accepts older photoshop brushes(only tips not presets) but i couldn't import anything from cs5 onwards. Well first of all i want to point out that krita accepts gimp brush tips and png tips (like medibang), so this opens up to a lot more brushes to use.
0 kommentar(er)
